Friday, December 30, 2011

Molycorp's $1 billion rare-earth gamble

Molycorp's $1 billion rare-earth gambleFortune, 18-Nov-11
By Richard Martin

How an American company is trying to break China's monopoly on high-tech minerals.
Few weekenders making the four-hour run from L.A. to Vegas notice the big mill works overlooking Interstate 15 at Mountain Pass Summit in California, near the Nevada line. Even fewer realize that the pale-pink buildings, gone patchy with age, are the focus of an extraordinary business drama that involves national security, China's monopolizing the strategic market in rare-earth metals, and one company's attempt to restore American preeminence in a crucial mining sector it once dominated.

Those sprawling buildings are owned by a Denver mining company called Molycorp (MCP), which is now spending nearly $1 billion to restart rare-earth-mineral production at Mountain Pass Summit and in the process revive a moribund U.S. industry. It won't be easy. A decade ago the U.S. was the world's biggest supplier of lanthanides, scandium, and other rare earths, and the Mountain Pass mine was the world's largest producer of the minerals. Rare-earth elements enable the creation of super-magnets, which operate at high temperatures and are also used for a range of high-tech applications, from missile-guidance systems to compact fluorescent light bulbs to wind power turbines to motors in electric vehicles. Ironically, rare-earth minerals aren't really rare; they get their name because they are spread widely throughout the earth's crust in small concentrations that in most cases can't be mined economically. In all, there are 17 rare-earth elements, which are typically found in varying proportions in the same ore deposits. China, with the world's largest supply, has been ramping up production over the past two decades, leading to steep price drops that eventually forced the Mountain Pass mine to shut down operations in 2002. China now controls 97% of the market.

Over the last year, however, the Chinese government, which views rare earths as a key element in its move from a low-cost producer of cheap manufactured goods to a high-tech powerhouse, has drastically reduced its export quotas, particularly for the heavy rare earths, like terbium and dysprosium. That sent prices through the roof last summer: At one point the price of dysprosium, used in the manufacture of advanced lasers, more than doubled in a week, and overall rare-earth prices shot up 1,500% from 2009 to 2010, to an all-time high.

Wanting to capitalize on the rare-earth shortage, Molycorp, backed by $1 billion in private equity from Resource Capital Funds in Denver, began selling rare earths at its California mine in October and soon after announced third-quarter net income of $43.7 million, vs. a loss of $10.1 million a year earlier.

Running such an operation is not cheap, so CEO Mark Smith, a mining veteran who has spent nearly a quarter-century working on Mountain Pass, took the Denver-based company public last year, raising $379 million. When Molycorp stock reached its peak of $77 a share in early May, it was the most successful IPO of 2010 as measured by share-price increase since going public.

Since then the stock, which has a $3 billion market cap, has suffered a cave-in, dropping some 56%. Why? The rare-earth "crisis" has generated an old-fashioned gold rush, as miners in ore-rich countries like Australia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and even Afghanistan announced plans to bring new supplies to market. Influential minerals forecaster Dudley Kingsnorth of Industrial Minerals of Australia, reduced his prediction for 2015 demand by nearly 13%. Stock-trading blogs now talk of a "rare earths bubble." Manufacturers in Japan and elsewhere, hesitant to trust their future raw materials supply to China, have embarked on an aggressive R&D search for rare-earth substitutes. That search could pay off in a few years.

With all the bad news piling up, Molycorp, a once highly touted company, now looks increasingly like a billion-dollar roll of the dice.

A customer for every bucketful
Standing on the edge of the open pit into which his company is pouring all that cash, Smith appears unfazed by recent developments. Yes, more suppliers are coming online, but he argues, "Look, we just do not see any way that the market for rare earths is going to reach equilibrium between now and 2015."

Ruggedly built, with steel-gray hair that matches the frames of his fashionably narrow eyeglasses, Smith looks as if he could be an NFL head coach. He was, in fact, a promising defensive back, planning on playing for the Colorado School of Mines until a knee injury ended his football career. He wound up graduating from Colorado State and getting his law degree from Western State University in California, and has worked as an attorney for the mining industry ever since.

Five hundred feet below him, ground water at the bottom of the mine shines a vivid green. Along the terraced sides, rare-earth deposits appear in gray bands amid the reddish brown of the rock. A pair of uranium prospectors found the Mountain Pass lode in 1948 and formed the Molybdenum Corp. of America. The rare-earth elements had little value until the advent of color TV in the late 1950s, when they became prized as phosphors to brighten the screens. By the early 1980s U.S. production had reached almost 40,000 metric tons a year, but already Chinese mines -- mostly in the country's far west, in Inner Mongolia -- were catching up. "The Middle East has oil," Chinese leader Deng Xiao Peng reportedly remarked in 1987. "China has rare earth."

After the Chinese flooded the market with cheap rare-earth minerals, forcing Molycorp to close its mine, Chevron (CVX) acquired the property in its takeover of Unocal in 2005. Three years later Resource Capital Funds, led by Ross Bhappu, the former head of business development at mining giant Newmont (NEM), bought the mine, invested $1 billion, and hired Smith to lead the re-formed Molycorp. Their foresight was admirable: By 2009 plenty of people who months earlier wouldn't have known a lanthanide from a Land Rover were sounding alarms about the rare-earth shortage as the Chinese tightened exports. In July the World Trade Organization ruled that China's export quotas violated international trade law. But the Chinese government, saying that it's cleaning up dirty mines and eliminating black-market ones, has publicly said it will continue to tighten exports.

China will export around 24,000 metric tons this year, down from 38,000 a year ago, Smith explains. The rest of the world needs about 57,000 metric tons. Working from stockpiled ore alone, Molycorp will produce 5,500 to 6,600 tons this year. That leaves a gap of around 27,000 tons, a hole big enough, Smith believes, to keep prices inflated for the next several years.

Smith's confidence in part is that of a seller with a guaranteed customer base. "Every bucketful we pull out already has a customer," he says. What's more, if China follows through on its declared intentions, it will soon devote all of its rare-earth production to the domestic market, which accounts for close to 60% of world demand. That leaves a still-healthy $500 million market to be satisfied in the rest of the world.

In August, Molycorp opened an office in Tokyo, where most of its biggest customers have their headquarters. And the company has moved quickly to shore up what many industry observers say is its biggest weakness: While most of the ore at the Mountain Pass mine is rich in lighter rare earths, the real worldwide shortage (along with the highest prices) is in the heavies: terbium, dysprosium, europium, and a few others. In September -- not long after a J.P. Morgan analyst downgraded Molycorp shares -- the company said it had found a new deposit a few miles from Mountain Pass, on federal land where Molycorp owns mining permits, that is rich in the heavy rare earths.

Smith also says he is banking on new, environmentally sound mining technology that promises to lower prices. When Molycorp is finished replacing its milling and refining facilities at Mountain Pass, it claims it will not only be the cleanest producer of rare earths in the world (the original mine was dogged by environmental violations stemming mostly from its wastewater, which was radioactive because of small amounts of thorium and uranium found in the ore), but also the world's lowest-cost producer. Since adding environmental safeguards usually adds to the cost of any extraction process, that would be a remarkable feat.

John Burba, Molycorp's chief technologist, explains it this way: Rather than using expensive, trucked-in chemicals to separate the rare earths from the ore, the company will use recycled saltwater, a byproduct of mining. And instead of buying expensive electricity off the grid, Molycorp is going to produce its own energy: Vanderweil Engineers is building on the mining site a 49-megawatt power plant, fired with cheap natural gas from a nearby pipeline. The old Molycorp used to dump its tailings in a slurry behind a dam. Now it will use a high-pressure system to squeeze out most of the water, leaving behind a "paste" that will be reburied in what's essentially a 90-acre landfill just west of the pit mine. All told, the company claims it will produce rare earths for $1.25 a pound. China's cost is $2.53 a pound, while some experts believe that production from Australian mines, owned by Molycorp rival Lynas, will cost a whopping $4.59. "We've been through the situation before where we weren't the low-cost producer in the world," says Smith, referring to the 1990s, when Mountain Pass was undercut by Chinese rivals. "We didn't like it."

Meanwhile, Congress has taken up the issue of China's rare-earth monopoly. No fewer than nine bills that would support the resurgence of the U.S. rare-earth industry are pending or awaiting introduction. Counting on the currently gridlocked Congress to take action -- even on an issue of national economic competitiveness -- is like believing you can beat the house at a Vegas casino. So there sits Molycorp, pushing ahead, placing that billion-dollar bet on its own.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Access Capital spreads equity, denies exodus

Access Capital spreads equity, denies exodus
I&T News, 5-Jul-2010
[Full Link]

Access Capital Advisers (Access CA) has denied media rumours of a mass exodus of its partners, and has clarified how it will redistribute the 24 per cent shareholding sold back to the firm by departed director Paddy Jilek.

Access CA said yesterday that Jilek was the only one of the firm’s four founding partners to no longer be working for the asset consultant, although it confirmed two other partners, both of whom held an approximate 1 per cent share in the business, had left recently.

These departees were Guillaume Valdant, the former head of private equity at the firm, and former reporting/operations chief Julian Widdup.

Two new partners have been promoted, with Tom Snow, a Rhodes scholar, rising from associate director to partner within the Access CA infrastructure group, focusing on Australian investments. Meanwhile Kui Ng becomes a partner and continues to head the consultancy’s property group.

These two have bought some of the equity which Paddy Jilek sold, since he ceased to be an employee of Access CA in January 2010, and ceased to be a director effective July 1. Equity has also been allotted to the company secretary and the chief financial officer of the consultancy.

A founding partner and the chief executive officer of Access CA, Alexander Austin, refused to comment on persistent industry talk that Jilek’s departure related to the integrity of valuations obtained from independent valuers on deals either advised upon or directly put together by Access CA.

Austin acknowledged that Access CA would be losing South Australia’s Statewide Super as a client, but said the two organisations would continue to work together on co-invested deals.

He said the performance of Access CA’s portfolios, famously heavy on unlisted assets, had begun to improve from the doldrums of the global financial crisis. The consultancy’s template unlisted portfolio has returned a net 9.97 per cent a year since 1999, against a 7.42 per cent return for an amalgam of the ASX300 and the MSCI World ex-Australia indices.

The experience of 2008-09 had lead to a few changes in the Access CA approach, Austin said, with “purely defensive” assets such as government bonds and cash once again a permanent feature of the house strategic asset allocation.

The “learning experience” had also lead to enhanced liquidity management protocols within the Access CA approach, including the use of 12-month rather than 3-month currency forward contracts, giving clients “more time to manage the effects of a rapid currency depreciation”.




ID theft claims emerge in MTAA Super inquiry
St Michael Investigations, 17-Jun-2011
[Full Link]

THE prudential regulator’s investigation of MTAA Super has reached a new level of intrigue, with claims of identity theft as the Coalition seizes on governance of the fund as evidence of a wider industry malaise.

Yesterday, an email was circulated, purporting to be from Paddy Jilek, a founding director of MTAA Super’s asset allocation consultancy Access Capital Advisers, who left last year to join investment bank UBS.

The email, containing suggestions about further lines of inquiry on MTAA Super, was sent from a Yahoo address.

Mr Jilek denied all knowledge of it and otherwise declined to comment.

“Maybe Access advised against MTAA hedging policy?” the email says.

“Since when does a regulator investigate underperformance? Why you (sic) not asking what the regulator is really looking into on mtaa board?”

Clearly, the lid has been blown off a can of worms this week, with reports that the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority had appointed Clayton Utz partner Jane Paskin to probe the performance of the nation’s 10th biggest industry fund for the three years to June last year.

MTAA Super, which has a relatively strong bias to illiquid infrastructure and property investments, had $1.67 billion in negative investment income in the year to June 2009.

The fund reportedly lost more than $500 million from the removal of currency hedging, but chief executive Michael Delaney shot this down on Wednesday.

Denying there was $500m in hedging losses, he declined to name a figure and said the fund was only unhedged “for a short period of weeks”.

Access executives Alexander Austin and David Chessell and a third employee have been questioned on oath by APRA, with some examinations said to have continued for 14 hours.

APRA, however, has stuck rigidly to its policy of not commenting on regulated institutions, and Mr Delaney has declined to take questions.

Mr Austin emerged briefly to defend the firm’s business model against suggestions of perceived conflicts, as it advises funds on asset allocation and earns management fees from assets it introduces to its clients.

Access, he said, had pioneered the approach of offering asset management services to its advisory clients.

“All investment decisions are taken by trustee boards in full knowledge of the nature of this advisory relationship, including any fees to Access,” he said.

Amid calls for MTAA Super to release a full set of accounts and for Mr Delaney to step down, the vacuum was filled by Canberra.

The large retail funds have long agitated for a bigger role in highly lucrative award super, which is dominated by union-influenced industry funds.

“Super is one of the many things that are negotiated in an award, and it’s part of the DNA for a union,” Warren Chant of consultancy and researcher Chant West said.

“But for employers, it’s often the first thing they give away in award negotiations. There are no objective criteria for choosing default funds, and retail funds are not getting the same opportunity as industry funds.”

Coalition senator Mathias Cormann blamed Assistant Treasurer Bill Shorten for protecting “closed shop” arrangements for the selection of default super funds under awards.

The top 10 default funds were all industry funds and were listed 330 times in awards after being chosen in “a secretive process riddled with undeclared conflicts of interest”, he said.

Last year, MTAA Super was added to six awards, despite its balanced growth fund’s performance being ranked 48 out of 49.

Mr Shorten reaffirmed the government’s election commitment to a Productivity Commission review, starting next year, of the way in which default funds were selected.

The review would be considered before the July 2013 introduction of the MySuper reforms, he said.

Mr Chant said it was unprecedented to hear of an APRA investigation taking evidence on oath, followed by a “jumble” of information in the following days about whether the fund had been hedged or unhedged.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Wall Street Unoccupied With 200,000 Job Cuts

Wall Street Unoccupied With 200,000 Job Cuts
Bloomberg, 21-Nov-11
By Max Abelson and Ambereen Choudhury

John Brady, co-head of MF Global Inc.’s Chicago office, was having a vodka cocktail at the Ritz- Carlton in Naples, Florida, overlooking the Gulf of Mexico, on the day his company reported its largest-ever quarterly loss.
“Wow, the sun just set,” Brady said to his wife and two colleagues attending a conference with him, he recalled in an interview. “I hope it doesn’t set on MF Global.”

A week later, on Oct. 31, the firm led by former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) co-Chief Executive Officer Jon Corzine collapsed. Brady and 1,065 colleagues joined a wave of firings that has washed away more than 200,000 jobs in the global financial-services industry this year, eclipsing 174,000 in 2009, data compiled by Bloomberg show. BNP Paribas (BNP) SA and UniCredit SpA (UCG) announced cuts last week, and the carnage likely will worsen as Europe’s sovereign-debt crisis roils markets.

“This is something very different,” said Huw Jenkins, a former head of investment banking at UBS AG (UBSN) who’s now a London- based managing partner at Brazil’s Banco BTG Pactual SA. “This is a structural change. The industry is shrinking.”

Wall Street rebounded from the financial crisis of 2008 with the help of unprecedented government support, including loans from the U.S. Federal Reserve. Goldman Sachs posted record profit the following year, and bonuses paid to securities-firm employees in New York City rose 17 percent to $20.3 billion, according to New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.

‘Nothing There’
Now, faced with higher capital requirements, the failure of exotic financial products and diminished proprietary trading, the industry is undergoing what Steven Eckhaus, chairman of the executive-employment practice at Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, called “a paradigm shift.” The New York attorney, whose clients have included former Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Chief Financial Officer Erin Callan, said he has stopped giving his “spiel” about inherent talent leading to new work.

In interviews, a dozen people who have lost jobs at firms including Societe Generale SA, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS) and Jefferies Group Inc. (JEF) described a grim banking landscape that also includes Occupy Wall Street protests against unemployment stuck above 9 percent and income inequality.

“These are by far my darkest days,” said Scott Schubert, 49, who was dismissed in late 2008 as a mergers-and-acquisitions banker at Jefferies, a New York-based securities firm, and has been unemployed since. “It’s harder and harder to look for a job and feel that there’s nothing there.”

HSBC, BNP Paribas
Banks, insurers and asset managers in Western Europe have been hardest hit, announcing about 105,000 dismissals this year, 66 percent more than the region’s losses in 2008 at the depths of the financial crisis, Bloomberg data show. The 50,000 job cuts in North America this year are more than twice last year’s and fewer than the 175,000 in 2008.

Almost every week since August has brought news of firings by the world’s biggest banks. HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), Europe’s biggest lender, announced that month it would slash 30,000 jobs by the end of 2013. In September, Bank of America Corp. (BAC), the second-largest U.S. lender, said it would cut the same number of jobs. Both banks are trimming about 10 percent of their employees. Last week, BNP Paribas, France’s largest bank, said it will cut about 1,400 jobs at its corporate and investment- banking unit, and UniCredit, Italy’s biggest, said it plans to eliminate 6,150 positions by 2015.

“It’s a once-in-a-generation challenge,” said John Purcell, founder of London-based executive search firm Purcell & Co. “Everyone who has worked in the City since 1985 will have no idea of how to cope with this level of dislocation.”

Panic Attacks
Neil Brener, a psychiatrist whose patients work in London’s City and Canary Wharf financial districts said the stress is contributing to panic attacks, binge drinking and chest pains.

“Because there are fewer jobs, people are unhappy about being stuck,” Brener said. “They don’t have options about moving, and there is a sense of feeling trapped.”

London hiring could be frozen next year, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research Ltd. Headcount in the City and Canary Wharf may fall to 288,225 by the end of the year, 27,000 fewer than in 2010 and the lowest since at least 1998, when there were 289,666 jobs, according to the London- based research firm.

Wall Street won’t regain its lost jobs “until about 2023,” Marisa Di Natale, an economist at Moody’s Analytics in West Chester, Pennsylvania, said in an e-mail.

Second Time
That’s not encouraging for Michael Reiner, 44, who lost his job in June as a credit strategist in New York for Societe Generale (GLE), France’s second-largest bank, whose shares are down 60 percent this year. When he called his wife to tell her the news, she was home watching “The Company Men,” a film about corporate downsizing, he said.

It wasn’t the first time Reiner had lost a job on Wall Street. He worked at Bear Stearns Cos. for 14 years until the firm collapsed in March 2008 and was taken over in a fire sale by JPMorgan Chase & Co. He said he was happy to have some time off with his family and go to Little League baseball games.

When he began looking for a job, he “wanted to find a place for the next 14 years,” he said. A recruiter brought him to Paris-based Societe Generale. It didn’t last that long.

It’s harder to talk about losing a job the second time, Reiner said. “There are a lot of people I haven’t told.”

Opportunities for employment “evaporated” as the European debt crisis escalated, he said. Now he spends his time going to his daughter’s field hockey games and managing his investments. He’s planning to make maple syrup from the trees in the backyard of his home in Briarcliff Manor, New York.

‘Fruitless’ Search
For Schubert, the former Jefferies banker in his third year looking for work, the longer he’s out of a job, the harder it is for him to tell his 10-year-old son to do his homework, he said.

“It might seem outwardly to him that I’ve given up,” he said in an interview this month from his four-bedroom home in Glen Ridge, New Jersey. “I can’t come to the table and say, ‘Well, when you were five, I worked nonstop.’”

Schubert, who received a master’s degree in business administration from New York University in 1989 and was a managing director specializing in middle-market M&A deals at Jefferies, said he wasn’t surprised when he lost his job in 2008 during the financial crisis. He thought unemployment would last 12 months at most.

“The first year out was fruitless,” he said. “There wasn’t much hiring going on at all.”

By the middle of 2010, more potential employers seemed interested, and he felt “something was imminent,” he said. Nothing happened.

This year, he has become increasingly disheartened by bad news on Wall Street, and it’s more difficult to stay in touch with former colleagues as time goes by, he said.

Hurricane Irene
On the August weekend of Hurricane Irene, training to coach his son’s soccer team alongside younger fathers, being “overly competitive for a man of my age,” Schubert twisted his right knee, he said. He aggravated the injury doing yard work and worries how much his health insurance will help, he said.

While his investment choices haven’t been “too terrible,” he will consider selling his house if he doesn’t find a job. “God, I hope it’s in the next six months,” he said.

Hetal Patel, 44, a foreign-exchange trader who worked at London-based Lloyds Banking Group Plc (LLOY) for more than 20 years until last month, said he doesn’t plan to look for work until early next year, “when budgets become clearer and perhaps conditions improve.”

Shares of his former company, controlled by the British government since a bailout in 2008, have fallen 64 percent this year, and the bank has posted a pretax loss of 3.86 billion pounds ($6 billion) in the first nine months. It announced 15,000 job cuts in June.

RBS Cuts
Another lender backed by the U.K., Edinburgh-based RBS, has announced about 30,000 job cuts, including 2,000 this year, since receiving the world’s biggest government bailout in 2008. Its shares are down 50 percent in 2011, and CEO Stephen Hester said Nov. 4 the investment bank “will have to shrink further.”

Tim Leary, 29, a director in high-yield and distressed trading, lost his job there on Nov. 7. After he got the news, he called his wife to say he’d see her and their 4-month-old son for breakfast.

He drove back to Manhattan from his office in Stamford, Connecticut, and put together a resume for the first time in years. He said he plans to spend “a fair amount of time figuring out what the landscape is” before starting his search.

Falling Bonuses
“Unfortunately, the industry always seems to get it wrong and they over-hire,” said Philip Keevil, 65, a former head of investment banking at S.G. Warburg & Co. and now a partner at New York-based advisory firm Compass Advisers LLP. “They are over-optimistic and then periodically throw large numbers out.”

Morale on Wall Street and London is “probably as bad, if not worse” than it has been in decades, said Keevil.

Wall Street bonuses are expected to fall in 2011 from the $128,530 average last year, DiNapoli, the state comptroller, said in October. Even so, when Goldman Sachs set aside 24 percent less to pay employees in the first nine months than in the same period last year, the amount, $10 billion, was equal to $292,836 for each of its 34,200 workers as of Sept. 30. That’s nearly six times the median household income in the U.S., where 49.1 million live in poverty, according to Census Bureau data.

Quitting for Quito
Wyatt Laikind, 26, made three times as much in his first year out of college working at Citigroup Inc. (C) as his single mother earned when he was growing up in western Massachusetts.

“It was like winning the lottery to get that job,” said Laikind, who worked as an associate on the New York-based bank’s high-yield credit-trading desk.

He got a job on Wall Street because he “was under the impression that it was a more meritocratic environment,” and “my hard work and intelligence would be paid off,” he said.

At first, he liked the excitement, he said. Then, after financial regulations curtailed proprietary trading, the job became “less appealing.” He said he didn’t like smiling at clients while having to figure out how to profit from them.

In July, after a vacation, he called his boss to quit, he said in an interview from Quito, Ecuador, where he is now working for Equitable Origin LLC, a start-up that offers a certification system for oil exploration. His salary is less than 5 percent of what he made at Citigroup, he lives with intermittent hot water, and he was robbed at knifepoint last month, he said.

“I feel happier on a daily basis,” Laikind said.

Sagging Mattress
His tone was different in a later e-mail.

“I wasn’t brought up in luxury, so I like to think I can tough it out,” he wrote, describing the sagging mattress he slept on in jeans and a hooded sweatshirt to stay warm. “But I may have to give it up and try going back to finance soon.”

If he does, it won’t be easy.

“Until now, at many firms, a lot of investment bankers have been convinced that we are living now in a limited period where things are a bit more difficult and afterwards the old world will come back,” Kaspar Villiger, 70, chairman of Zurich- based UBS said in an interview this month. “This illusion has now vanished.”

Increased capital requirements agreed to by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will limit banks’ use of borrowed funds to boost profit, lower their return on equity and likely reduce executive compensation, analysts say. High leverage “was the juice in the system,” said Ilana Weinstein, CEO of New York-based search firm IDW Group LLC. “It’s gone.”

Boxer Shorts
For Brady, 42, the vanishing point at MF Global arrived after he returned to Chicago from Florida. He thought the New York-based futures brokerage would “weather the storm,” even as Moody’s Investors Service cut its rating and shares plunged, he said. He got word that another company would buy the firm while at a Talking Heads cover-band concert and celebrated with a friend by drinking Anchor Steam beer and shots of Jameson.

He woke on Oct. 31 at 4:40 a.m. and searched for deal reports on his phone while standing in his boxer shorts with an electric toothbrush in the other hand. He didn’t find any.

The acquiring firm, Interactive Brokers Group Inc., pulled out of the deal after a discrepancy in client accounts surfaced, and MF Global filed for bankruptcy later that day.

At first, Brady thought his company would survive, he said. His wife thought he was in denial. His mood changed when he was sitting in the home office adjoining his bedroom, looking at the value of his holdings.

“My Fidelity account looks like my bar tab from just a week ago,” Brady said.

All Fired
On Nov. 11, a human resources executive asked colleagues on Brady’s floor to gather by his desk, which looks out on the Willis Tower, the tallest building in the U.S. They were all fired. She told them to show receipts for large personal belongings to the plainclothes security guards by the elevators, and that checks would be sent in the mail, Brady said. Someone asked if the checks would bounce. She said she didn’t know.

Brady, who said he wasn’t aware of the size of the bets MF Global made on European sovereign debt, wrote to clients this month saying he’s looking to join a firm that believes “integrity and honesty are the single most important ingredients to success.” He said last week he is optimistic.

To contact the reporters on this story: Max Abelson in New York at mabelson@bloomberg.net; Ambereen Choudhury in London at achoudhury@bloomberg.net

Friday, November 18, 2011

James Altucher, Wall Street's Keeper of the Pain

James Altucher, Wall Street's Keeper of the Pain
Bloomberg, 17-Nov-11
By Roben Farzad

Shaggy-haired, bespectacled James Altucher is a 43-year-old venture capitalist who puts money into tech startups such as Buddy Media—last valued at $500 million. He has also designed websites, worked as a financial columnist, and run a fund that invested in hedge funds. Along the way, he lost his savings and his marriage, and by his own admission suffered several nervous breakdowns.

Now Altucher has turned his misfortune into a source of wisdom and comfort for the despondent. He shares his insecurities and psychic traumas with 30,000 Twitter followers and on his blog, the Altucher Confidential, which he says has had 10 million page views since he launched it a year ago. His self-published book, I Was Blind But Now I See, has ranked as high as No. 2 this year in (AMZN)Amazon.com’s motivational books category, and he’s publishing a comic book about his life. “I think the role James fulfills in the post-crash world is beacon of hope,” says Joshua Brown, a financial adviser who blogs as the Reformed Broker. “I know it sounds corny, but no one has been more forthcoming about how the torn economic fabric of this country has affected him personally. The message is always centered around him still being here—that there’s life after financial near-death.”

While blogging is his passion, Altucher makes his living investing in tech startups as founder and managing partner of Formula Capital in New York. “The guy is too complicated to analyze, and I’m not a psychologist, but he knows his stuff,” says John Pappajohn, a biotech investor in Des Moines who helped found Caremark (now (CVS)CVS/Caremark ) and seeks Altucher’s insight on companies and the markets. “I don’t go to New York without asking him to breakfast.”

On a November morning, Altucher digs into pancakes at a diner near New York’s Grand Central Terminal, having just blogged from a (FDX)FedEx Office/Kinko’s. “A year ago I had a revelation,” he says. “I’ve failed time and again, hurt myself and others, woke up angry and scared at three every morning. I needed to open up and share.” In October 2010, Altucher started posting confessions on everything from business failure and sex to death and depression. Example: “I was completely lost, four years old, running around the department store looking for my parents who I was afraid had abandoned me. … I’m still wondering why they were thinking of entering the elevator without me.”

Shortly after launching his blog, Altucher learned that the top search query bringing readers to the site was “I want to die.” He realized that the Altucher Confidential had become much more than an exercise in self-exploration. “There is such a deep need out there to know you are not struggling alone,” he says. In one August post he wrote about the times he had pondered ending it all and how he managed to persevere. The essay prompted an outpouring of gratitude from grieving parents, laid-off breadwinners, and battered women. “I was just really f***ing sick of letting a man hit me,” wrote one reader. “So I left. And the fear I was living with died.”

Altucher’s path to this unlikely role dates to the mid-1990s, when the computer programmer launched a startup to build websites for media companies. In 1996 he successfully pitched (TWX)HBO on III: am, a Web series that had him wandering the streets of Manhattan late Tuesday nights to see what people were doing at that hour. “Altucher’s conversation with an Eighth Avenue transvestite prostitute brings out the desperation and loneliness of those who don’t (or can’t) fall asleep with the rest of us,” wrote a reviewer in Newsweek.

In 1998, Altucher was recruited to redesign the investor portal TheStreet.com. While working there he caught tech-stock fever and made millions speculating with the money earned from the sale of his media consultancy. He bought a big apartment in Tribeca, decorating it with expensive art. He says he played poker every day in 1998, including the night his first child was born—and took helicopters to Atlantic City to stave off boredom.

By the summer of 2000, with dot-com stocks imploding, Altucher says he was losing $1 million a month. He put his apartment up for sale. “I had two kids to feed,” he says. “I honestly thought I would kill myself—that I’d be better off dead if my family got my life insurance.” He hit bottom in 2002. “Cash was running out at the bank, expenses were going up, the house was standing still and nobody wanted to buy it, and eventually I would be unable to buy diapers and food for my children. This wasn’t just me. In the last decade this has happened to a lot of people.”

In desperation, he e-mailed money managers with his investing ideas. Jim Cramer of TheStreet.com hired him to write about stocks, and a hedge fund manager threw him some money to invest. Altucher also began writing for the Financial Times, and started his own hedge fund, as well as 10 investing websites. He sold the most successful one, Stockpickr, for $10 million in 2007; he wound down his hedge fund just before the financial crisis.

While Altucher had come back from the financial brink, he says he was an emotional wreck. By the end of 2008, his marriage was falling apart, and he found himself drinking heavily and holing up at the Hotel Chelsea. With the stock market in free fall at the beginning of 2009, TheStreet.com and the Financial Times let him go, and TV bookers stopped calling. “So once again,” he says, “I was lost.”

Altucher, now remarried, credits intensive yoga, Eastern philosophy, and introspection for rescuing him and changing his perspective. In a Nov. 8 blog post, he reflects: “How much happier would I have been if I had said in 1999, ‘You know what, I have enough cash now to live forever and pursue creative, charitable, or spiritual pursuits so I could become a better person.’”

“He’s at peace,” says Howard Lindzon, co-founder of StockTwits, and a former co-investor with Altucher on deals. “It’s all very cathartic for him.” Even so, Lindzon calls Altucher “a pain in the ass who would just disappear for months at a time. Would it have killed him to see the light back then?”

Homeownership and college education have become Altucher’s bêtes noires. He calls the mortgage industry “programming by the machine. By the banks, the corporations, the government, that wants you in hock.” Altucher, a Cornell grad, faults colleges for churning out “debt slaves” who take unhappy jobs just to service their loans. “If you could,” he says, “take half the people accepted into Harvard and tell them they can’t go to college. Then compare them in 20 years. It’s about ambition. Not the diploma.”

At his Formula Capital, Altucher says he is finding no shortage of promising opportunities in tech and media. He thinks the Dow Jones industrial average may hit 20,000 in a few years. “The economy is about to boom,” he writes. “Bernanke just printed up a trillion dollars and airlifted it onto the U.S. economy.” Even so, he does not believe individual investors have enough patience, discipline, or nerve to invest in stocks successfully. Altucher himself concedes his message is a work in progress that is rife with dissonance and contradictions. Not unlike the times.

Monday, November 14, 2011

H. Gobind Khorana, 89, Nobel-Winning Scientist, Dies

H. Gobind Khorana, 89, Nobel-Winning Scientist, Dies
NYT, 14-Nov-2011
By DENISE GELLENE

H. Gobind Khorana, who rose from a childhood of poverty in India to become a biochemist and share in a Nobel Prize for his role in deciphering the genetic code, died on Wednesday in Concord, Mass. He was 89.

His death was announced by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where Dr. Khorana was a professor emeritus.

Dr. Khorana, who received his early schooling from his village teacher under a tree, advanced his education through scholarships and fellowships to become an authority on the chemical synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids, the large molecules in cells that carry genetic information.

He received the 1968 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Robert W. Holley of Cornell University and Marshall W. Nirenberg of the National Institutes of Health. They worked independently of one another and received the award for showing how genetic information is translated into proteins, which carry out the functions of a living cell.

Their experiments looked at the nucleic acids found in RNA, a chemical in cells that translates the genetic information contained in DNA. RNA is composed of four chemical bases, adenine, cytosine, uracil and guanine, which are represented by the letters A, C, U and G. The three scientists showed that these chemical bases combine to form three-letter “words” that represent amino acids, the components from which proteins are constructed. Dr. Nirenberg discovered the first word, UUU, the code for phenylalanine.

Dr. Khorana used chemical synthesis to combine the letters into specific defined patterns, like UCUCUCUCU, from which he deduced that UCU encoded for serine and CUC encoded for leucine. His work unambiguously confirmed that the genetic code consisted of 64 distinct three-letter words. He and Dr. Nirenberg discovered that some of the words told a cell where to begin reading the code, and where to stop.

In 1972, Dr. Khorana reported a second breakthrough: the construction of the first artificial gene, using off-the-shelf chemicals. Four years later, he announced that he had gotten an artificial gene to function in a bacterial cell. The ability to synthesize DNA was central to advances in genetic engineering and the development of the biotechnology industry. “He left an amazing trail of technical achievement,” said Dr. Thomas P. Sakmar, a professor at Rockefeller University and a former student.

Dr. Khorana’s lab also turned out leaders in academia and industry. One former student was involved in the creation of Applied Biosystems, which developed equipment used to decode the human genome. Another student, Michael Smith, was a recipient of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for devising a method of manipulating DNA.

Har Gobind Khorana was born in the village of Raipur in the Punjab region, which is now part of Pakistan. Not certain of the date, he said he was probably born on Jan. 9, 1922. He was the youngest of five children of a Hindu tax clerk for the British colonial government, who was dedicated to educating his children. His family was “practically the only literate family in the village inhabited by 100 people,” Dr. Khorana wrote.

His aptitude for science was evident from the start. He received a scholarship to study chemistry at Punjab University, although he had been too shy to attend the required admissions interview. He received his bachelor’s degree from Punjab University in 1943 and his master’s from there in 1945.

After earning a doctorate in organic chemistry from Liverpool University in England in 1948, he spent a year doing postdoctoral research at the Federal Institute of Technology in Switzerland, where he secretly took up residence in a laboratory until some financing came through.

He received a research fellowship at Cambridge University, a center for the study of proteins and nucleic acids, where James D. Watson and Francis H. C. Crick would discover the double-helix structure of DNA in 1953. Dr. Khorana was drawn to the field.

In 1952, he was recruited to the British Columbia Research Council in Vancouver to join a group working on nucleic acids. He developed a new method of synthesizing nucleotides, and achieved international recognition for synthesizing coenzyme A, which is involved in converting fats to energy.

His move to Canada coincided with his marriage to Esther Elizabeth Sibler, whom he had met in Switzerland. “Esther brought a consistent sense of purpose into my life at a time when, after six years’ absence from the country of my birth, I felt out of place everywhere and at home nowhere,” he wrote.

His wife died in 2001. Their daughter Emily Anne died in 1979. His survivors include another daughter, Julia Elizabeth, and a son, Dave Roy.

In 1960, Dr. Khorana moved to the Institute for Enzyme Research at the University of Wisconsin, where he did the work that led to his Nobel Prize. His lab included researchers from 27 countries with expertise in basic chemistry, molecular biology, enzymology and biochemistry, a multidisciplinary effort unusual for its time.

Dr. Khorana became an American citizen in 1966. He joined the M.I.T. faculty in 1970 and retired in 2007.

Among the honors Dr. Khorana received were the Lasker Award for basic medical research in 1968 and the National Medal of Science in 1987.

Dr. Khorana, an unassuming man, shied from the spotlight and did not like talking on the phone. In the weeks before he received the National Medal of Science, a stack of message slips piled up on his desk with increasingly urgent messages that the White House had called and that he should call back, Dr. Sakmar said. With the ceremony date fast approaching, a representative of the White House tracked down Dr. Khorana at a scientific meeting and told him he would be receiving the award. Dr. Khorana assured him he would attend.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

New York City's Hurricane History

New York City's Hurricane History
Weather.com, 23-Aug-2011
By Becky Kellogg

Hurricane Irene is threatening the U.S. and could impact tens of millions of Americans along the East coast by this weekend.

People from the Deep South to New England are watching the storm's progress very closely to see how Hurricane Irene will impact them. Several cities who were highlighted by Hurricane Expert Dr. Rick Knabb as being overdue for a hurricane hit, are in the cone of concern. New York City is one of those cities.

"Hurricanes in New York City metro area are relatively rare events because of the geography (places like Cape Cod stick much farther out into the ocean), typical steering patterns, and a tendency for tropical systems to weaken as they go very far north," says The Weather Channel's Senior Meteorologist Stu Ostro.

Only 5 hurricanes in records dating back to 1851 have tracked within 75 miles of New York City. The most recent one being in 1985.

1985 (Cat 1): Gloria
1976 (Cat 1): Belle
1938 (Cat 3): Long Island Expressway
1894 (Cat 1): No name given
1893 (Cat 1): No name given

One of New York's unique challenges in dealing with a hurricane would be mandatory evacuations. It takes hours to evacuate significantly smaller cities, such as New Orleans and Savannah. But New York, as America's most populous city, faces a unique set of evacuation challenges.

“It’s a concern because surveys in recent years have shown that even after the 2004, 2005, and 2008 seasons there is complacency in places which are much more prone to hurricanes, much less in places where hurricanes are very infrequent." says Ostro. "Plus this is one of the last big weekends of the summer with many people heading to the beaches. Folks in New York City and elsewhere need to be closely monitoring the progress of Irene just in case.”

Regardless of Irene's eventual impact on the U.S., Hurricane Expert Rick Knabb says now is the time to prepare. Learn your evacuation routes, get your evacuation kits ready, and be ready to move if your local official order an evacuation notice.

Saturday, August 06, 2011

For a Standout College Essay, Applicants Fill Their Summers

For a Standout College Essay, Applicants Fill Their Summers
5-Aug-11, NYT
By JENNY ANDERSON

Josh Isackson, an 18-year-old graduate of Tenafly High School in New Jersey, spent the summer after his sophomore year studying Mandarin in Nanjing, China. The next year he was an intern at a market research firm in Shanghai. When it came time to write a personal statement for his college applications, those summers offered a lot of inspiration.

“When I was thinking about the essay, I realized that taking Chinese was a big part of me,” he said.

So Mr. Isackson wrote about exploring the ancient tombs of the Ming dynasty in the Purple Mountain region of Nanjing, “trading jokes with long-dead Ming Emperors, stringing my string hammock between two plum trees and calmly sipping fresh green tea while watching the sun set on the horizon.”

Jill Tipograph, who founded a consulting company called Everything Summer, helped Mr. Isackson plan the China trips. To Ms. Tipograph, his experience was the best possible outcome: he loved China, and the trips offered priceless fodder for the cutthroat college application process. (Mr. Isackson will attend Yale University this fall.)

“Students are planning their summer experiences to augment who they are and discover who they are, and that absolutely helps the college process,” she said.

Students preparing to apply to college are increasingly tailoring their summer plans with the goal of creating a standout personal statement — 250 words or more — for the Common Application in which to describe “a significant experience, achievement, risk you have taken or ethical dilemma you have faced and its impact on you.” Specialized, exotic and sometimes costly activities, they hope, will polish a skill, cultivate an interest and put them in the spotlight in a crowded field of straight-A students with strong test scores, community service hours and plenty of extracurricular activities.

A dizzying array of summer programs have cropped up to feed the growing anxiety that summer must be used constructively. Students can study health care in Rwanda, veterinary medicine in the Caribbean or cell cloning at Brown University, or learn about Sikkim, India’s only Buddhist state.

For those who lack the means to pay for an essay-inspiring trip, at least one scholarship program exists to help. Ten 11th-grade New York City public school students won the Palazzo Strozzi Renaissance Award, which entailed traveling around Italy for a month this summer to study the culture, philosophy and arts of the Renaissance. The students were required to keep diaries and write a final essay, which the foundation said would be used with their college applications.

Suddenly, the idea of working as a waitress or a lifeguard seems like a quaint relic of an idyllic, pre-Tiger Mom past.

“The reality is that the whole process of getting into school is extremely competitive, and it’s not only what you do during the school year — your grades and extracurriculars,” Mr. Isackson’s mother, Marla Isackson, said. “It’s your whole package, including what you do in the summer.”

Students do not have to spend a summer abroad for an essay-worthy experience. When Mary Lang Gill was a rising senior at the Atlanta Girls School, a private school, she hired Pam Proctor, an independent college counselor and the author of “The College Hook,” a college admissions guide. After learning that Ms. Gill loved to paint, Ms. Proctor connected her to the Florida Highwaymen, a band of renegade painters active during the 1950s and ’60s.

“I spent a whole day with them,” painting and observing, said Ms. Gill, who just graduated from Dickinson College. “It was one of the coolest things ever, and I love that and I got to put it on my application.” Ms. Proctor said she spent a great deal of time with students helping them find the right topic for the college essay. “Picking the essays is as important as writing them,” she said. After that, she said, the stories “write themselves.”

As colleges look for specialization, “mastery” and “passion” have become buzzwords at many New York City private schools. Along with the perception that perfectly developed essays are essential is the sense among some parents and teachers that colleges have shifted from valuing balanced students who excel in several areas, like history and ice hockey, to demanding students who perform well across all subjects and have an area of “mastery,” like squash or fencing, that showcases one’s depth.

“Colleges have moved people from thinking they should be exceptionally well rounded to using the vocabulary that ‘well rounded’ means ‘no edge,’ ” said Bruce Poch, the former dean of admissions at Pomona College.

Mr. Poch said members of his office staff sometimes joked that they were witnessing the “complete disappearance of summer jobs,” especially among upper-income applicants who opted for “decorative” internships at places like investment banks, where they could work with friends of their parents. He said further evidence of overspecialization was the disappearance of the multisport athlete. “It’s all but vanished,” he said.

Mr. Poch wonders if the specialization emphasis is going too far. “It can rob children of their childhoods,” he said.

Susan Warner, an independent college counselor, said she believed an application essay should be about the student, not about an activity.

“Parents always ask, ‘What should my child do this summer to assist in the college application?’ ” Ms. Warner said. “I tell them it’s as significant to scoop ice cream as it is to build houses in a foreign country.”

Some students make sure to cover several bases during the summer. Rebecca Weinberg, who will be a senior at the Dalton School in Manhattan, loves writing and theater. She built a summer around both. For two weeks, she worked as a camp counselor at Applause Theatrical Workshops, a performing arts program on the Upper East Side that she attended as a child. Then she attended a three-week creative writing program at Columbia University. For the last part of the summer, she is working as a camp counselor, preparing for the SATs and trying to squeeze in some beach time in the Hamptons.

“I’ve always been really interested in theater and creative writing, and I wanted to do things that included those things and helped my college application,” she said.

She said her friends were doing fellowships with surgeons, taking engineering classes at Columbia and working alongside interior designers.

“If you can find something in the summer that marries your interests, it’s a home run,” her mother, Pamela Weinberg, said. “Your child is happy, and it will help them stand up in a sea of very well-qualified kids.”

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Who Needs the Hamptons? Dip and Sip at Manhattan’s Poshest Swimming Pools

Who Needs the Hamptons? Dip and Sip at Manhattan’s Poshest Swimming Pools
Bloomberg, 29-June-2011
By Lili Rosboch and Catherine Smith

This happens all the time, especially when it’s hot: You wake up and decide it’s a perfect day to lounge around a pool sipping something cold.

If you aren’t already at the Hamptons, you’ll need access to deck chairs, a pool and drinks. Here’s our list of options in Manhattan:

Holiday Inn
440 W. 57th St.
212-581-8100
http://www.holidayinn.com/

By far the most straightforward is the midtown Holiday Inn with an outdoor, rooftop pool, plastic lounge chairs and a long line of liquor bottles that shimmer against a wall the color of sea foam. Frozen-drink machines dispense strawberry daiquiris and pina coladas for $8. Burgers cost $5; hotdogs are $3.

Kids are allowed, though the sign says the lifeguard can eject them at will every hour on the hour for an adult swim.

The pool is open from 10 to 6 daily; access costs $70 and includes a towel. But consider the $25 day pass for the over 21 set. It’s available Monday through Friday after 3 p.m. A little research revealed that deck chairs are first-come, first-served and fill up quickly on the weekend. Cash only.

James Hotel
27 Grand St.
212-465-2000
http://www.jameshotels.com/New-York.aspx

The glass elevator at The James is a good indication of the swank scene that awaits on the rooftop above the 17th floor. The hotel’s modern indoor bar and small outdoor pool with deck, both under a vague door policy, are surrounded by views of Midtown, Wall Street and the Hudson River.

Grab an orange towel and an open lounge chair. Stop inside at the Jimmy for a St. George Absinthe Drip ($22). Don’t despair of the cost; the pool is free from noon to 5 p.m. on weekends. Swimming is off-limits at all other times unless you’re a hotel guest.

The Peninsula
700 Fifth Ave. @ 55th St.
212-956-2888
http://www.peninsula.com/New_York/en/default.aspx

To get access to the brand-new, wrap-around sun deck opening on July 1 and the glass-enclosed pool at the Peninsula hotel, book a “Spa-cation” Monday through Thursday for $285. It includes 75 minutes of treatments like holistic massage or intensive facial, a bento-box lunch, yoga, sunscreen and more.

While there’s no swim-up bar, there’s a full-time attendant, and cocktails like a $22 frozen margarita are just a room-service bell away.

To get access on the weekend, book two hours of spa services for approximately $400 or ask for a summer fitness membership for $500 monthly with a three month minimum. The luxurious facilities are located on the top three floors of the 22-story hotel with views over Central Park.

Gansevoort Meatpacking
18 Ninth Ave. @ 13th Street
212-206-6700
Gansevoort Park Avenue
420 Park Avenue South
212-317-2900
http://www.hotelgansevoort.com/

The Gansevoort Meatpacking also offers full access to its rooftop pool Monday through Thursday for the cost of a $299 Renewal Day Package. It includes spa services like massage, facial and manicure/pedicure, and a poolside drink from the adjacent Plunge bar. Cocktails include raspberry caipirinhas and the French Kiss, which combines vodka, Chambord and Champagne.

If you’re claustrophobic, this might not be your place. The sundeck is only a narrow strip surrounding the pool, separated from the bar by a hazy glass wall.

Still, the view is great, and when you have sun, swimming and cocktails in the heart of Manhattan there’s not much to complain about.

Le Parker Meridien
119 W. 56th St.
212-245-5000
http://www.parkermeridien.com/index1.php

Soon, maybe even this weekend, Le Parker Meridien on 56th Street will reopen its outdoor deck near the already open indoor pool, with lounge-side cocktail deliveries available.

A day pass to the facility is $100, on Saturdays and Sundays too, so keep checking their website for details on deck- opening day. Proximity to the Burger Joint is a plus.

Soho House
29-35 Ninth Ave.
212-627-9800
http://www.sohohouseny.com/

Of course, you could also book a room in a hotel with a pool like Trump Soho, Thompson LES or The Empire.

Soho House in the Meatpacking district is a members-only club with a small number of hotel rooms offered at $350 and up a night.

The outdoor, rooftop pool has a beach feel. Extra-wide lounge chairs are pushed together on one side to create the largest communal couch we’ve ever seen. The dining area is shaded by umbrellas, and two bars complete the scene. It’s a very relaxed atmosphere where kind servers in striped dresses cater to your needs.

City Pools

Lasker Pool
West 110th St. @ Lenox Avenue
212-534-7639
http://centralpark.org/index.php/attractions-h-w/lasker-pool-%20rink/

There are also 50 free outdoor city pools opening today. We like the Lasker Pool in Central Park which is open from 11 to 7 daily with an hour off from 3 to 4 in the afternoon. Officially, imbibing isn’t allowed in public, though stealth nipping might go unnoticed.

Friday, June 17, 2011

Wall Street Braces for New Layoffs as Profits Wane

Wall Street Braces for New Layoffs as Profits Wane
NYT, 16-Jun-10
By SUSANNE CRAIG

Wall Street plans to get smaller this summer. Faced with weak markets and uncertainty over regulations, many of the biggest firms are preparing for deep cuts in jobs and other costs.

The cutback plans are emerging even as Wall Street firms have mostly recovered from the financial crisis and are reporting substantial profits again. But those profits are not as big as they were before the crisis, and it is expected that in the coming months it will be even more difficult for firms to make money. Worries about debt in Europe and the shape that the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul rules will ultimately take, combined with the usual summer doldrums, are prompting banks to act.

“It’s a tense environment right now,” said Glenn Schorr, an analyst with the investment bank Nomura.

Even Goldman Sachs, Wall Street’s most profitable firm, is retrenching. Senior executives at Goldman have concluded they need to cut 10 percent, or $1 billion, of noncompensation expenses over the next 12 months, according to a person close to the matter who was not authorized to speak on the record. The big pullback will cause Goldman employees, who have already been ordered to cut costs, to re-examine every aspect of their business.

The firm, this person said, had not set final targets for layoffs, but Goldman was “certain” to shrink headcount in the coming months. Decisions on bonuses are still months away, but they are sure to come down as well if business does not pick up.

Bank of America is also examining its expenses and is likely in the next few months to cut some staff members from its securities division, according to one senior executive at that firm who was not authorized to speak on the record. And Credit Suisse is in the process of identifying people to cut in its investment banking unit, according to a person briefed on that bank’s plans.

Morgan Stanley is expected to cut at least 300 low-producing brokers in its wealth management division this year, more than the firm initially expected, and has announced plans to cut $1 billion in noncompensation expenses over the next three years. Unlike many of its rivals, however, the firm so far has no plans to cut staff members from its investment banking and trading division, which has added hundreds of employees over the last two years or so as part of a rebuilding effort after the financial crisis.

Some firms have already wielded the ax. In January, Barclays Capital cut 600 people, or more than 2 percent of its worldwide staff, citing a business slowdown, and recently cut more employees for “performance-related reasons,” according to a person briefed on the cuts but not authorized to speak on the record. A third of the January cuts were in New York.

Regulatory overhaul has weighed on the decisions to cut back, senior bank executives say. Regulation has caused some Wall Street banks to exit some businesses, like proprietary trading. Rules that require banks to hold more capital will probably cause some firms to end certain business lines as they decide they can more effectively deploy the capital elsewhere. On products like derivatives, firms will lose revenue as instruments once traded off exchanges will move into open markets.

While many financial rules are still to be written, some firms have decided that they cannot afford to wait any longer. The last significant industrywide job cuts were in early 2009. In the first quarter of that year Goldman alone cut its work force by almost 9 percent. Since then, most firms have held steady on their head counts or have added to them slightly. That will change this summer.

The scale of the expected cuts is bad news for the New York City economy, which depends heavily on a booming financial industry to pay taxes and fill its restaurants. And they will come as the national economy is still struggling to find its footing since the financial crisis.

Not all is doom and gloom. Wall Street is benefiting from the boom in social media and technology public offerings. In recent weeks big names like Pandora Media and Linkedin have gone public, brought to market by banks. So far this year, companies have raised $29.3 billion in public offerings, up more than 200 percent from a year ago. This year is on track to be the most lucrative since the technology boom in 2000, according to Thomson Reuters data.

The profit picture is also somewhat more stable for diversified companies like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup, which have large commercial retail banking operations in addition to those in trading and sales. JPMorgan has no immediate plans to cut head count in trading, according to a person briefed on the matter but not authorized to speak on the record. The bank is, however, trying to reduce noncompensation expenses.

But firms like Bank of America are still paying for mortgage sins of days gone by, which have dimmed their profit pictures. Earlier this year Bank of America put aside another $1 billion to cover claims from outside investors who lost money and want the firm to buy back billions of dollars in bad Countrywide Financial mortgages. The Durbin Amendment, a proposed restriction on debit card fees, is also expected to reduce profits when it comes into effect next month.

For those firms that depend on trading, it is clear how much the engines of Wall Street have slowed. Return on equity, the amount a firm earns on its common stock outstanding and an important measure of financial performance, has decreased significantly in the years since the credit crisis. Industrywide return on equity was 8.2 percent in 2010, down from 17.5 percent in 2005, according to Nomura.

And this year there is another reason that is prompting Wall Street to act more swiftly on cuts. Wall Street typically pays out roughly half of its revenue in compensation, and firms often wait until late summer to cull staff when they have a better sense of revenue for the year. The newest cuts are expected to come earlier this year because of recent changes in the way employees are paid.

Traditionally, Wall Street employees get most of their annual pay in the form of a one-time year-end bonus. But after the credit crisis most firms changed the way they compensated employees in an effort to discourage excessive risk-taking, increasing base salaries while reducing performance-related payments. As a result, banks are paying out more compensation as the year goes on, forcing firms to re-evaluate staffing levels earlier in the year because more of their compensation costs are now fixed.

Firms are also trying to cut noncompensation expenses and are looking for ways to cut fat. Goldman’s goal to cut $1 billion in noncompensation expenses this year is significant, analysts say. There will be immediate and significant savings from the fall off in trading volumes.

Trading firms pay fees to trade, and lower volumes could result in an annual savings of $200 million at Goldman alone, one analyst estimated. Those savings will come naturally, but most will not, and banks will be forced to rein in everything, including travel and professional fees.

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Monopoly Lost: Atlantic City's Rise and Fall

Monopoly Lost: Atlantic City's Rise and Fall
AP, 31-May-11
By WAYNE PARRY

Four years ago, some Atlantic City casino customers were shelling out $1,000 for a brownie sprinkled with edible gold dust in a Baccarat crystal they could take home.

Nowadays, some wait until 11 p.m. to eat so they can get a steak dinner for $2.99.

At the beginning of 2007, Atlantic City's 11 casinos were at the top of a wave of prosperity. Starting with the 1978 opening of Resorts, the nation's first casino outside Nevada, Atlantic City for years was the only place to play slots, cards, dice or roulette in the eastern half of the United States. The cash kept pouring in, the busloads of visitors kept coming and the revenue charts went one way: straight up.

And then, they didn't. Now, battered by competition from casinos all around it, Atlantic City is in a fight for its very survival.

The resort is furiously trying to remake itself into a vacation destination that happens to have gambling, but with no guarantee it has a winning hand even as other threats loom, including the possible expansion of casinos to north Jersey racetracks and a growing push for online gambling.

Intoxicated by years of success, Atlantic City missed numerous opportunities to diversify its offerings, widen its customer base and fend off competition that clearly was on its way even 20 years ago.

"The atmosphere was a total irrational exuberance; it truly was," said Robert Griffin, CEO of Trump Entertainment Resorts, who worked at Trump properties here in the 1980s and 1990s. "There was a feeling that there was no end to the good times and that the money would never end."

Then, disaster struck the nation's second-largest gambling market. A perfect storm of competition right on its doorstep in Pennsylvania, New York and Delaware, coupled with the recession, pummeled Atlantic City worse than any other casino market. In four years, a billion and a half dollars vanished, along with thousands of jobs and tourists. Pennsylvania, with its 10 casinos, is poised to knock Atlantic City into third place at some point next year.

How did things go so wrong so fast?

Cars streamed into Atlantic City on May 26, 1978, and people lined the Boardwalk for blocks, waiting to get inside Resorts on the first day it was legal to gamble there.

People bought tickets for buffets they had no intention of eating, just to sneak inside the casino earlier than the rest. Men relieved themselves into plastic coin cups to avoid losing their spot at the tables by going to restrooms. And cash — more than anyone had ever seen and more than management could imagine — flooded into the counting room, to the point that it took nearly an entire day to count it.

"It was euphoria," said Steve Norton, who was Resorts' executive vice president when it opened and now runs a casino consulting firm in Indiana. "I mean, it was an unbelievable time."

One after another in the 1980s, casinos kept coming. Revenues reached a high point of $5.2 billion in 2006.

And then the Pocono Downs harness racing track in Luzerne County, Pa., added slot machines and opened them to the public on Nov. 14, 2006. Suddenly, people in the heart of one of Atlantic City's key feeder markets could drive 10 or 20 minutes to play the slots instead of making a three-hour round trip to Atlantic City. In less than four years, there would be 10 casinos in Pennsylvania, all of which now offer table games, too.

They took in nearly $2.5 billion last year, approaching Atlantic City's $3.6 billion. So far this year, they are running neck-and-neck: $996 million for Pennsylvania, and $1.1 billion for Atlantic City.

"If you didn't anticipate this competition coming, you were asleep at the wheel," said Israel Posner, executive director of the Lloyd Levenson Institute of Gaming at Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.

David Schwartz, director of the University of Nevada-Las Vegas Center for Gaming Research, said Atlantic City can be successful again, "but it's going to require a reinvention."

"Basically, the city needs to stop looking backward and start looking ahead," he said.

A look back reveals many missteps and lost opportunities. The most obvious: a failure to reinvent the resort as a place to go for more than gambling. Atlantic City belatedly jumped on the bandwagon, adding non-gambling amenities over the past eight years like celebrity restaurants, spas, shopping and top-name entertainment. The Borgata even built a stand-alone luxury hotel called the Water Club, and Harrah's indoor pool has become a cash cow, doubling as one of the city's hottest nightspots.

But back then, anything customers couldn't bet on was seen as a waste of money.

"Nobody wanted to build anything other than casinos," Norton said. "The property values shot up so high, it didn't make sense to build anything else."

There's plenty of blame to go around. Casino owners focused only on their own properties instead of the market as a whole, a habit that Atlantic City is only recently shaking off. Competing against each other instead of Las Vegas was the city's playbook for decades.

Now, the casinos are banding together for joint marketing efforts, and will chip in to help sponsor the biggest names in entertainment, rather than letting one casino pay the whole cost of a Britney Spears or Lady Gaga show, or a rodeo. And three casinos are even thinking of jointly funding a new convention or trade show center in Atlantic City to draw badly needed midweek business.

New Jersey also erred by failing to approve legalized sports betting in 1991 when it was given the chance to do so ahead of a nationwide ban, gambling experts say. A state senator sued the federal government in 2009 to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, but the suit was dismissed by a federal judge last month.

When Griffin, the Trump CEO, lays his head on the pillow at night, he worries that New Jersey will one day succumb to political pressure from lawmakers in the more populous northern part of the state to expand casino gambling to the Meadowlands racetrack, 10 minutes from New York City. Analysts expect it would instantly become a $1 billion market. State law now allows casino gambling only in Atlantic City.

"That would devastate us," he said. "This would become a two-casino town; it wouldn't even take five years. That's what keeps me up at night."

Maddie Downey, a bartender at the Showboat, has her own worries. The single mom has already lost one casino job when the Sands closed in 2006, and worries that gas prices will stay near $4 a gallon, keeping people away from Atlantic City.

"I'm just glad to have this job," she said. "I just hope it doesn't get any worse, and I hope the price of gas comes down."

When the Indian-run Foxwoods casino opened in Connecticut in 1992, it was the closest casino to Atlantic City — and a sure sign that more were to come. Mohegan Sun, another tribal casino, opened in Connecticut four years later. The resort responded by allowing its casinos to stay open 24 hours a day; they formerly had to close for a few hours in the wee hours of the morning. It also introduced new games like poker, keno and racing simulcasts.

But the money kept coming in, and the two Connecticut casinos didn't prove to be a major problem for Atlantic City, which sat on its cards. No new casinos opened until the Borgata in 2003, which would usher in a new era of grand dreams — very few of which would ever come true.

The Borgata touched off a casino arms race, with companies from across the country vying to build the next mega-resort here. At the start of 2008, there were plans for as many as four new casinos; MGM Mirage unveiled a $5 billion, three-tower casino project that would have been the largest ever built here.

Pinnacle Entertainment blew up the Sands to make way for its own $2 billion casino resort, modeled on a beach house. Before setting off the explosives that would bring it down, then-CEO Dan Lee spoke of the importance of keeping the market fresh, new and exciting. The challenge, he said, is "to compete in this new world, or be the next implosion."

Yet by the end of 2008, Pinnacle and MGM's projects imploded on their own, and Revel, the first of the new projects to actually put shovels in the ground, was limping along. It would run out of money in 2009 and halt construction on the interior. Morgan Stanley, its major financer, walked away from the project, deciding it was better to take a nearly $1 billion bath on the deal than to stay in Atlantic City.

After scouring the globe for financing, including asking the Chinese government, Revel CEO Kevin DeSanctis finally secured new financing in February 2011 that allowed the project to resume, with some state tax incentives.

"Every market got hit, but nobody faced the amount of new competition coming online as much as Atlantic City did," said Larry Mullin, who was president of the Borgata at the time and now runs an Australian casino company. "We were just exposed. Nothing was going to stop the convenience customer from trying a product that was closer to them. I just don't think there was any silver, magic bullet. It was a very tough situation."

Torn between demands from the New Jersey casino and horse racing industries, New Jersey's incoming governor, Republican Chris Christie, sided in 2010 with the casinos, which provided more tax revenue to the state's coffers. He refused to allow slot machines at the racetracks — something the racing industry has long wanted to keep pace with its competitors in other states.

New Jersey staged a quasi-takeover of Atlantic City's casino and tourist zones; Christie called it "a partnership." But the new tourism zone is run by the state and takes charge of many functions Atlantic City's often dysfunctional municipal government had long struggled with, including safety, cleanliness and economic development. (At one point just a few years ago, four of the previous eight mayors of Atlantic City had been arrested on corruption charges.)

The $30 million in annual payments that the casinos had to pony up to the horse racing industry, in return for keeping slots out of the tracks, will now be used to market Atlantic City nationally. The state rewrote many of its famously strict regulations for casinos, removing, among other things, minimum staffing requirements. They even allowed casinos to keep some jackpots that had built up on progressive slot machine games that they decide to cancel.

State-mandated economic redevelopment funds collected from each casino will now be used solely for projects within Atlantic City; before, the money was spread around the state.

The help cannot come too soon. Casinos are selling at fire-sale prices. Within the past year, The Tropicana, Resorts and Trump Marina have all sold for about 10 cents on the dollar from their values of just a few years ago. The Atlantic City Hilton stopped paying its mortgage in 2009 and is looking for a buyer. The casinos have shed nearly 15,000 jobs since 1997, with more layoffs to come.

The extra marketing money is crucial to Atlantic City's future, said Frank Fantini, a Delaware casino consultant and publisher.

"If it can create that same, "I gotta go party!' atmosphere that Las Vegas has, it ought to be able to work," he said.

Griffin, the Trump CEO and Casino Association president, said Atlantic City should bottom out at around $3.5 billion, then slowly start to grow again.

"There's a lot of pain coming, but I strongly believe that in 2012 you're going to see us coming back," he said. "I definitely think better days are ahead for Atlantic City."

Could that be a new marketing slogan for Atlantic City? Most of America seems to know that "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas." Yet how many people can correctly cite Atlantic City's tourism slogan, "Always Turned On"? The resort is thinking of a new slogan.

The effort has been going on for three years.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Election Upset in West New York

Election Upset in West New York
Hudson Reporter, 15-May-11
By Santo Sanabria

Roque slate wins by large margin

The community of West New York was surprised Tuesday night when longtime Mayor Sal Vega and his Board of Commissioners lost their re-election bids to a band of largely political newcomers led by local doctor Felix Roque.

After the town’s high taxes spurred Roque to begin a thwarted recall effort against Vega two years ago, Roque continued his political involvement, putting together a slate of candidates to take Town Hall.

In West New York’s form of government, voters elect five commissioners to run the town, and that group elects one of them mayor.

Roque said on Wednesday that he will be the mayoral choice when his slate takes office this coming Tuesday.

The West New York election results turned out to be a surprise for many in the community. Felix Roque had the highest vote total, with 3,763.

Count Wiley had 3,236, Caridad Rodriquez had 3,349, FiorD’ Aliza Frias had 3,219, and Ruben Vargas had 3,215.

Just behind them, Mayor Silverio “Sal” Vega had 3,137, Michele Fernandez-Lopez had 2,809, Lawrence Riccardi had 2,864, Albert Rodriguez had 2,830, and Gerald Lange had 2,802.

Independent candidate Ercides Aguasvivas got a mere 238 votes.

New leaders in Town Hall

Tuesday night, at Roque’s 60th Street headquarters, his supporters chanted repeatedly, “Llego papa,” which means “Dad has arrived.”

“We are going to make a difference,” Roque announced after learning he had won. “Your children can now have the same dreams I had as a kid”

Count Wiley asked the crowd of supporters “what do you want? What do you have?” while the crowd shouted “freedom!”

Roque and Wiley continually thanked God for the victory.

Walking to Town Hall

Roque and his slate and followers then walked to Town Hall, where Vega and his supporters had been counting votes earlier in the evening. But Vega had already left.

Initially Roque was not allowed up the steps to address the people, but soon, the police allowed him to climb the steps.

A Town Hall worker came outside and read the results aloud.

“Tomorrow we are going to have a party,” shouted Roque to his supporters. “God is great.”

He added, “I was told I won, but you truly won. You made me win. I am excited for the people. The people put me on this mission, and I spearheaded the movement.”

“These whole three years I did it for the people,” Wiley said. “I put my heart and soul into this and I am glad it did not go in vain. I am happy with the outcome.”

Ruben Vargas said, “I feel great to liberate the people from the last administration, where crime was sky high.”

A changing of the helm

The newly elected commissioners will be sworn Tuesday, May 17 at 12 p.m. at West New York Town Hall.

Roque said that his goals for the future include lowering taxes and cutting the crime rate.

Vega spokesman and political consultant Paul Swibinski said Wednesday that he believes the results can be attributed to “February 2009 when the town needed to raise taxes. Nothing could have repaired the damages of the taxes, but it is part of a democracy. We congratulate the Roque team in running a good campaign. We will cooperate during transition for it to run smoothly for the best interest of the people of West New York.”

Other sources said that the county’s political machine, the Hudson County Democratic Organization, did not come through to help Vega fend off Roque’s challenge.

Roque Campaign Manager Joe Demarco said, “We always believed we could do it. Those voters that wanted to vote, we made sure they had an opportunity. We had great passion and the people’s support to help us during the elections.”

He said that the supporters who were involved in the recall effort were involved in the win.

Sunday, May 08, 2011

Profile: Arianna Huffington

Arianna Huffington: mover and shaper
The Telegraph, 7-Feb-2011
By Mick Brown

Arianna Huffington this week became an internet mogul. Mick Brown examines her unstoppable rise

In a career spanning some 40 years, Arianna Huffington, once described as "the most upwardly mobile Greek since Icarus", has worn many faces.

She has been an author, polemicist, radio talk-show host, sometime staple of British newspaper gossip columns, a Republican political wife, a failed gubernatorial candidate, a woman who has journeyed across the political spectrum from ardent conservative to committed liberal. Indeed, looking at her CV, it can sometimes seem that Huffington has not so much had several cycles in one life, but several lives – to which can now be added yet another incarnation: media mogul.

This week it was announced that the The Huffington Post, the "internet newspaper" (as she describes it) that she edits, has been acquired by the internet provider AOL in a deal worth $315 million. Founded in 2005 by Huffington and the former AOL executive Kenneth Lerer, the HuffPo – as, excruciatingly, it has become known – has risen from being a marginal voice in the blogosphere to a prominent outlet for liberal opinion, and one of the most influential new-media platforms in America.

The HuffPo mixes content aggregated from traditional news outlets with in-house journalism, usually trumpeted in shouty upper-case headlines, and leavened with the obligatory dosage of celebrity gossip ("Christina Aguilera Totally Messes Up National Anthem"). But much of its following has been generated by a cast of bloggers that has included such disparate figures as Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, Scarlett Johansson and Neil Young, as well as Huffington herself.

Its front page yesterday made no pretence at modesty, proclaiming the birth of "A BRAND NEW MEDIA UNIVERSE – Arianna: The Huffington Post & AOL – A Merger Of Visions".

Under the deal, Huffington will be president and editor-in-chief of the Huffington Post Media group, which will integrate all Huffington Post and AOL content, including news, entertainment, video and such AOL sites as Moviefone, MapQuest and TechCrunch. It is claimed that the new combined media group will reach 117 million Americans and 270 million globally.

Overnight it makes Huffington one of the major players in the rapidly changing world of global media. It is a position that all who know her say that Huffington will relish.

What Arianna Huffington has always craved is not so much power as influence. It seems that her life's journey has been to get to the centre of the action, wherever that action may be, in the process accumulating as many useful allies as possible. An indefatigable networker and name-dropper, she is on first-name terms with a who's who of American life, from entertainment, politics and business. It would be tempting to say that she has the most compendious Rolodex in America – except that Huffington, of course, does not do Rolodex, instead running her life with three BlackBerries, which she claims to hide in the bathroom at night to ward off temptation.

Huffington was born Arianna Stassinopoulous in Athens in 1950. Her parents had been active in the Greek resistance movement during the war. Her father Constantine was a journalist who edited a resistance newspaper, survived internment in a Nazi concentration camp and later became a publisher and management consultant. When Arianna was 16, her parents separated and she moved to Britain with her mother and her younger sister Agapi to take the entrance examinations for Cambridge. Arianna was duly awarded an exhibition to Girton to study economics.

Displaying the ambition and determination that would become her salient characteristics, she rose to become president of the Cambridge Union, earning herself the unkind sobriquet "Staryanna Comeacroppalos". Chris Smith, the former Labour minister and now Lord Smith of Finsbury, and a contemporary at Cambridge, recalls her as "a very prominent figure", who became known for her habit of leaving her Alfa Romeo parked on double yellow lines, accumulating parking tickets.

"She was very striking and very glamorous, probably more of a socialite than a political figure but the liberal icon she has since become was not very evident in her student days. She was very much of the Right. I was regarded as being of the Left, and therefore the enemy."

After graduating in 1972, she was romantically linked with the Conservative MP John Selwyn Gummer and the journalist Simon Jenkins, before meeting Bernard Levin, The Times columnist and polymath, and the man she would later describe as "the big love of my life". She was 21. Levin was 42. She prepared for their first date by boning up on the latest developments in the Soviet Union and the music of Wagner. The relationship would last eight years, finally ending in 1980 over Levin's reluctance to have children. Following his death in 2004, she described him as her "mentor as a writer, and a role model as a thinker".

Huffington once recalled that Levin used to tell her "that going to bed with him was a liberal education". And education – or rather a furious appetite for self-improvement – has been a Huffington hallmark. At the age of 23 she wrote The Female Woman, a rebuttal to Germaine Greer's The Female Eunuch; she has since written serviceable biographies of Maria Callas and Picasso, self-help manuals, spiritual tracts and a novel about Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

With Levin, she became enamoured of the controversial Indian guru Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, the Rolls-Royce loving leader of the "Orange People", who promulgated a melange of traditional spiritual teachings and pop psychology nostrums. She departed from Rajneesh before he was engulfed in scandal, but her enthusiasm for new age thinking has been a constant in her life.

She went on to date Werner Erhard, a former encyclopaedia salesman whose organisation est made him one of the foremost self-help gurus of the 1970s, and she would later become a follower of another new age guru, Roger Delano Hinkins, known as "John-Roger", whose Movement for Spiritual Inner Awareness was the subject of a series of exposés in the Los Angeles Times in 1988, in which former members described it as sexually and financially exploitative.

She was reportedly "ordained" as a minister in the movement, and her former husband Michael Huffington, the Republican politician and scion of a Texas oil family to whom she was married for 11 years, would later describe John-Roger as having "more influence on her than anyone else in the world". Much of Huffington's philosophy remains steeped in the conviction that mankind is on the verge of, as she puts it, "a breakthrough in our evolution". She continues to pray, meditate and practise yoga daily and is an ardent exponent of green issues.

Her introduction to Michael Huffington came in 1985. Following the break-up with Levin, she had left London for New York with her mother, heeding the advice of the publisher Lord Weidenfeld to befriend the wives rather than the husbands of the East Coast power-broking elite. It was advice that would ultimately lead to her friendship with the philanthropist Ann Getty, who not only introduced her to Huffington but graciously footed the bill for their wedding in 1986. Henry Kissinger was among the 500 guests, observing that it had everything but ''an Aztec sacrificial fire dance''. Barbara Walters was a bridesmaid. Huffington's ascendancy to the summit of American society was complete.

The couple based themselves in Washington, where Michael Huffington was a deputy assistant secretary of defence in the Reagan administration, before moving to California in 1988 where he ran for, and won, a seat in Congress. In 1994 he ran for a senate seat, exhausting almost $30 million of his fortune but losing. The Republican strategist Ed Rollins, who managed Michael Huffington's campaign, would later describe Arianna as "domineering" and "the most ruthless and ambitious person I'd met in 30 years in national politics".

The couple divorced three years later, with Huffington explaining that "Michael decided that he wanted to go off to Europe and go on a boat, and I wanted to pick up my life and continue writing". The marriage produced two daughters, Christina, 21, and Isabella, 19.

Arianna, meanwhile, was advancing her own entry into politics. In 1995, she became a senior fellow at the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a conservative think tank founded by the Republican Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, and hosted a talk-show on a conservative cable-channel, National Empowerment Television.

But she was undergoing a sea change in her political views. In 2003 Huffington entered the California gubernatorial race as an independent against Arnold Schwarzenegger. Her campaign came to a swift close when it was revealed that she had paid only $771 in taxes for the previous two years. (Huffington claimed that the bulk of her income was child-support payments.)

Huffington has attributed her move from Right to Left to a growing belief that the private sector could not solve America's problems. Much of the Huffington Post's rising popularity came from her support for Barack Obama (at least at the time when his popularity was in the ascendant). And while her enthusiasm for Obama has waned, she has remained a strident critic of the far Right and the Tea Party movement - her sentiments summarised in the wordy title of her 2008 book Right Is Wrong: How The Lunatic Fringe Hijacked America, Shredded The Constitution and Made Us All Less Safe. (Sarah Palin, we may surmise, is not on the Huffington BlackBerry.)

Her merger with AOL, she has promised, will not temper the HuffPo's line. ''Far from changing our editorial approach," she wrote in an editorial yesterday, ''our culture, or our mission, this moment will be, for HuffPost, like stepping off a fast-moving train and on to a supersonic jet. We're still travelling toward the same destination, with the same people at the wheel, and with the same goals, but we're now going to get there much, much faster.''

Quite what this destination might be, she does not specify. But for Arianna Huffington, just getting there quickly has always been the point.